Letters: What Do You Think?

This week: Of Culture and Comebacks; and Quabbin Reality Check

Comments (4)
Thursday, May 03, 2012

Of Culture and Comebacks

Thanks to James Heflin for his recent cover story on Pittsfield's revitalization ("Pity City No More," April 12). The city of Pittsfield continues to use creativity to develop assets and build equity through cultural revitalization. From our perspective as former Northampton business owners (Pinch Pottery, founded in 1979) who currently operate Ferrin Gallery (since 2007) located in the "Upstreet Cultural District" of Pittsfield, we are watching the continuation of an era of private and public investment utilizing the combination of GE funds, city support and private benevolence. Having been participants in Northampton's revitalization that was driven by entrepreneurship during a growing economic period (1970s and 1980s), it is now astounding to see how the two cities have survived and prospered despite the recent recession. Creativity continues to be the common factor and leading force in both cities. With steady leadership from the Massachusetts Cultural Council's Anita Walker and support from Gov. Deval Patrick, the Pioneer Valley and the Berkshires are no longer in the shadow of Boston.

Donald Clark
Leslie Ferrin
Co-owners of Ferrin Gallery, Pittsfield


Quabbin Reality Check

Massachusetts Forest Watch (Letters, April, 19,2012) wants a ban on logging at the Quabbin. On its website, Environment Massachusetts laments that, "in the past few years, the Department of Conservation and Recreation has allowed logging that could threaten the quality of our drinking water."

Actually, logging has been going on at the Quabbin for the past 50 years. Yet the Quabbin, one of the largest unfiltered surface water supplies in the country, has an exemplary record of providing safe, high-quality drinking water to more than two million people for decades.

How does "commercial logging"—certainly a pejorative term when used by Forest Watch—fit into a program to deliver clean water to Boston? (By the way, commercial logging is also used in management of the water supply forests of New York City, Providence, Hartford, and New Haven.) The watershed forestry program at the Quabbin manages vegetation to diversify ages, sizes, and species of trees. The patterning of vegetation to create horizontal and vertical variation is key to maintaining a forest that can respond to predictable and unpredictable disturbances, large and small, over time, to maintain forest cover sufficient to protect water quality and supply. When the desired patterning can be achieved through sale of standing trees, rather than simply as a cost, so much the better. Not only is the primary goal of watershed protection achieved efficiently; a modest level of appropriate rural economic activity is a secondary benefit.

Mr. Matera [of Mass. Forest Watch] conjures an image of a relentless "timber industry" ravaging the watershed at enormous public expense. In fact, the forest management program operates under a set of widely recognized scientific principles and a long-term watershed management plan. Individual timber sales, numbering more than a thousand over the last 50 years, are mapped and supervised by professional foresters. Yet standing timber volume at the Quabbin increased by fourfold between 1960 and 2000.

Before you accept Forest Watch's description of a devastated landscape at the Quabbin, take the time to go the DCR Water Supply website, have a look at the management plan, drive or walk some of the Quabbin forest, and consider the water quality record of the last half century. It speaks for itself.

Charles Thompson


In his April 19, 2012 letter, Chris Matera wrote that "there is no good reason for logging in the Quabbin." For decades, I have owned hundreds of acres of forests bounded by the publicly owned watershed land and I can attest to many good reasons for the carefully monitored harvest of trees. Indeed, without a forest management program involving strategic cutting, the health of the Commonwealth's forests and those surrounding forests, belonging to townships, nonprofit land trusts and private property owners such as myself, would suffer.

Our forest cover is still recovering from a century of clear cutting when much of our land was managed for agriculture. Today's re-grown and re-planted forests benefit from deliberate maintenance which increases species diversity to better confront threats of disease, insect infestation and storm devastation as well as those caused by pollution and development. In addition to ensuring cleaner air, providing wildlife habitat and offering recreational opportunities, a healthy, diverse, multi-aged forest cover is critical to a plentiful and clean water supply.

Within the Department of Conservation and Recreation's (DCR) Division of Water Supply Protection, environmental professionals trained in biology, ecology, silviculture and related fields work, as they have for decades, to optimally manage forests such as those that surround the Quabbin. DCR's foremost goal is to preserve and ultimately to enhance the watershed lands which naturally filter drinking water for millions of Massachusetts residents, obviating the need for costly, artificially engineered filtration. Following publicly vetted long term management plans on state-owned land, DCR has accomplished what many states can only dream of in the realm of watershed forest protection. Harvesting trees on less than 1 percent of the forested acreage has continually improved our much acclaimed world class water producing ecosystem.

As with all successful endeavors, there can be problems and deficiencies. None of these are insurmountable and DCR has deliberately included the public in making policy. Like so many landowners on Massachusetts' watersheds whose forests are routinely monitored by DCR, I welcome the opportunity to participate in the process, help tackle the problems and partner with the state programs in place to manage the forests which so indispensably advantage us all.

Stephanie N. Selden
Stony Lane Farm

Comments (4)
Post a Comment

What is new, the vested interests and their apologists defend clearcutting and logging of the Quabbin watershed that protects the drinking water for 2.2 million Massachusetts residents with the typical timber industry propaganda about logging the forest to "help" the forest. War is peace.

The only "scientifically proven principal" operating in the Quabbin is the public treasure ending up in private bank accounts.

Decide for yourselves if the foxes in the Quabbin henhouse are really acting as stewards to our public watershed forests and "helping" the forest and water quality. Keep in mind most of the logs are shipped to Quebec, and the timber program operates at a loss and is subsidized by citizens.

Here are ground and aerial photos:

Here are Google Earth photos:

Inform and arm yourself against timber industry propaganda:


Chris Matera

Massachusetts Forest Watch

Posted by Chris Matera on 5.1.12 at 18:31

Do not for a moment think that the public is going to be consoled and comforted by the words of those who have a vested interest in the commericialization and commoditization of our commonwealth's natural resources.

With each and every pathetic and cowardly attempt by those in favor of industry to hide the truth from public oversight and to obfuscate the discussion with non pertient facts and hyerbole, more and more citizens become aware of this sustained attack on our freedom to enjoy nature without the fear of industrialization and commercialization, and the resistance grows to such practices.

Take some time to walk the watershed and observe the damage done in person, view the sattelite photos of the logging damage done, and draw your own conclusions from the facts. Don't let the timber barons influence your objectivity with their lies.

Posted by tiedyeguy on 5.2.12 at 6:21
Repeatedly the logging interests that stand to financially benefit from this horrid policy post warped and totally false claims of the "health" that these programs allegedly achieve. Fact is, prior to 2007, the forest "management" at the quabbin was light, with none of this horrendous work being done via clearcuts, and varients thereof hidden under other titles. One of the foresters that took such great care has spoken out behind the scenes vehemently opposed to what is currently going on. So to say "the quabbin has been managed for 50 years", is way off base. It has only been managed in the manner it is now for about 5. The American Society of Ecologists signed a letter to congress that flat out stated that this kind of management causes "permanent irreversable damage" to the ecology of the forests. So who should we believe, the real scientists, or the people managing the program that have direct interest in it? Its amazing how different a story you get once you sever the financial connection. Time to save what is left around quabbin before these actions destroy it for generation. Put real ecologists in charge, not timber interests trying to hide behind pseudoscience generated by the timber industry.
Posted by Ray Weber on 5.2.12 at 8:27

A logged forest is sick forest. A State forest is set aside for the native species that live there. A State forest is a Massachusetts species forest. NO? You want the State to give away whole trees for political gain? You want
Quabbin to loose it's canopy and become exposed to invasive species? Just let the species forest be. Let it be as good as it can be. Return all state land to the Great New England Forest. We want healthy state forests in perpituity.

Posted by Richard on 5.2.12 at 9:08



New User/Guest?

Find it Here:
search type:
search in:

« Previous   |   Next »
Print Email RSS feed

Better Later?
More joining the ranks in favor of a later start time for high schools
Between the Lines: Riding the Brand
Martha Coakley and Charlie Baker are more afraid to lose than inspired to win.
More Than A Coal Job
A veteran of the Mount Tom energy plant begins again.
From Our Readers
In Satoshi We Trust?
Outside the Cage
How solid is the case for organic and cage-free egg production?
Between the Lines: Practically Organic
Does the organic farming movement make perfect the enemy of good?
Scene Here: The Kitchen Garden Farm