BTL: Why Is the U.S. Stuck?

A once-dynamic society has lost forward momentum.

Comments (4)
Tuesday, February 26, 2013

“Your dearest wish is for our state structure and ideological system never to change, to remain as they are for centuries. But history is not like that. Every system either finds a way to develop or else collapses.”

Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn wrote that in 1974, in his famous “Letter to the Soviet Leaders.” But it could just as easily be addressed to President Obama, Congress, members of the media, corporate chiefs, and others who lead and maintain the power structure in the United States.

The United States is as ossified as the U.S.S.R. was before its collapse.

Shortly after the start of the financial meltdown in 2009, polls found American citizens disgusted with the capitalist system. Tens of millions said they would prefer socialism. When the Occupy Wall Street movement took off in 2011, mainstream pundits began using the “R” word, revolution, but only to ask a question with a predetermined answer. Regime change, they said, was neither desirable nor possible.

Too bad.

We used to amend the Constitution to suit changing mores. The last major amendment, granting the vote to 18-year-olds, was ratified in 1971. Apparently equal rights for women is too much to ask.

We don’t build anymore. Think about infrastructure. The last major public works project in U.S. history was the Interstate Highway System, built in the 1950s—not coincidentally, when the economy was booming.

Our political system is ossified, too. The massacre at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Connecticut prompted calls for tighter gun control. But nobody—not even liberals, the traditional enemies of gun rights—argued for getting rid of the Second Amendment, which, depending on your interpretation of the prefatory comma, allows us to join a militia or carry guns in our waistbands. “I have no intention of taking away folks’ guns,” President Obama has said.

Well, why not? Personally, I’m against gun control, and I’m glad that very little is going to change. Yet I find it disturbing that the Second Amendment is considered sacrosanct even by the 24 percent of Americans who want to ban handguns. Pointing out that the country is very different now than it was in 1789 seems reasonable. Maybe we don’t need guns anymore. A smart country, one willing to weigh the alternatives when trying to solve a problem, should be able to discuss the possibility of repealing the Second Amendment.

Look at our national political dialogue, which ranges from center-right (Democrat) to right (Republican). Whole strains of ideology, communist, socialist, nationalist, libertarian, are off the table. We pretend most of the ideological spectrum doesn’t exist. Not smart.

Our national unwillingness and/or inability to have a wide-ranging debate reminds me of New York City, where I have lived for many years. There are no public restrooms. Restaurants and other businesses post “Restrooms for Customers Only” signs on their doors. Yet peeing outside is against the law; in fact, it’s public exposure, a sex offense that can land you on a Megan’s Law-style pervert registry.

So where are you supposed to go? You know what’s even more insane? That we New Yorkers don’t even talk about it.

As a recent New York Times article by Louis Seidman pointed out, we have foolishly elevated the Constitution to the status of a sacred text, fetishizing a supposedly “living document” that in truth has been dead for years. (Congress, for example, has the sole right to start wars. President Bush ignored the U.S. Supreme Court’s decisions concerning POWs at Guantanamo. And so on.) The result, Seidman argues, is endless petty bickering about what the meaning of “is” is and what that stupid comma was supposed to be for.

The question for any society is not how to conform to rules and assumptions laid down by our forebears, but to come up with the smartest solutions to our problems and the best systems to make things run smoothly now and in the future. If we were inventing the United States from scratch, would we create the Electoral College? Doubtful.

The people of the United States are changing all the time, but the United States government and power structure are stuck. The political “culture wars” date to the 1960s and 1980s. Our military thinks the Cold War is still on.

Our economy reflects our national congealing.Once a “land of opportunity,” the U.S. is now anything but. If you’re born into a poor family, your chances of elevating yourself into the middle or upper class are lower in America than in other industrialized countries.

“It’s becoming conventional wisdom that the U.S. does not have as much mobility as most other advanced countries,” says economist Isabel Sawhill of the Brookings Institution. “I don’t think you’ll find too many people who will argue with that.”

Aside from the unfairness and instability caused by inequality and lack of social mobility, we’re losing the talents of tens of millions of Americans who will never be able to live up to their potential, share their ideas and contribute to the making of a more perfect union.

We haven’t had a major social or political revolution since the 1960s. It’s been too long. We must scrap long-held assumptions and reconsider everything from scratch—or collapse.•

Comments (4)
Post a Comment

The revolution should be to shrink government. That is the single biggest cause of our current situation, economic and otherwise: An ever expanding government. It's abundantly clear that we as citizens work for the government and they are always looking for ways to get more money out of us. We need to get back to a place where the government represents us and works within its limited scope as originally intended.

Most current issues can be boiled down to that problem. And we can refocus on equal opportunity rather than equal results. All humans are born in different situations with different natural talents and work ethics. Trying to engineer equal results hurts everyone.

Posted by k on 2.27.13 at 12:57

If China can modernize by being more capitalistic we can modernize by being more socialistic. I love the "Democracy at work" movement. We all like democracy right? Why not give subsidies to worker owned & run businesses. How about the mix of capitalism with socialistic programs like in the nordic countries that are doing well economically. McCarthyism forced socialistic thought from being an option. I'm not talking about Govt or Union bosses being in control. I'm talking about figuring out how employees not just top brass can reap benefits from hard work. We need to figure out a new structure to get rid of corporate & banker control, political corruption & what is up with those guys on the Supreme court? Corporations are NOT people! (even a kindergardener knows that!) The Forefathers, all rich white men, many of whom owned slaves & women, designed our republic as a test that SHOULD be adjusted to meet changes. Heck, We need to make some changes now! It's not the 1960's anymore. The country has been on a downhill since we landed on the moon. As, Tom RAIL mentioned in Between the Lines article,THE LAST BIG PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT was the interstate highway system built in the 50's. Let’s cut the military Budget & put those laborers & factories into business fixin infrastructure, build affordable handicap accessible housing. Let’s put people to work reading to children & to the elderly The middle class has been working more hrs & falling behind. We are not such a happy people here in the US with our high divorce rates, gun violence, obesity, everyone on anti anxiety or anti-depressant Rx-no wonder-financial hardship is stressful. Most poor are destined to be stuck in minimum wage & part-time jobs or have given up. Prisons are full of minorities who won't ever have a chance to get a job. Don't get me started! When will the citizen's WAKE UP? We need some mass demonstrations. Don’t you think we as a country can do better?! I suggest a start on Tax Day, April 15th! & July 4th & LABOR Day! I welcome more parties, green, socialist, labor, Ron Paul , whoever because the dems & republicans are not getting anything done! (although I do support a few like Eliz Warren, Bernie Sanders who is a socialist & Kirsten Gillibrand)

Posted by Agnes Kearon on 3.1.13 at 17:17

Capitalism works best because it's consistant with human nature. One thing our founding fathers got RIGHT was to limit government. Big GOV is way more corrupt than big CORP because you can't not buy it or go somewhere else. Big corp goes out of business when it screws up. Big gov just confiscates more money by force.

Gov't needs to get out of the way, not do more for us.

Posted by k on 3.2.13 at 14:37

Hate to break it to you, K, but capitalism isn't a form of government. It's an economic system. The Founding Fathers pushed this thing called "democracy." Most people (or at least those of my ilk) don't think capitalism is democratic at all.

And as for "Big corp goes out of business when it screws up," please name a few Big corps that have gone out of business recently because they screwed up. Seems to me (and I'm thinking oil spills and faulty vehicles here), Big Corps pay fines (often levied by the governments you don't want doing any more for us) and keep on going. It's far easier to think of some politicians who screwed up and didn't get re-elected.

Also: plenty of people get sick of their governments and go somewhere else. Ever hear of immigration? You might find it interesting to know, too, that white people didn't always live in the United States, but many of them moved here because they didn't like the governments where they originally lived.

I know, I know: it's just "human nature" to say whatever is on your mind and act like it's the truth.

Posted by CP on 3.5.13 at 8:15



New User/Guest?

Find it Here:
search type:
search in:

« Previous   |   Next »
Print Email RSS feed

In Satoshi We Trust?
Outside the Cage
How solid is the case for organic and cage-free egg production?
Between the Lines: Practically Organic
Does the organic farming movement make perfect the enemy of good?
Scene Here: The Kitchen Garden Farm
From Our Readers
Profiles in Survival
Young business owners in retail-rich Northampton get along by getting along.
The Burning Question
Neighbors of a proposed wood-burning plant in Springfield cry foul air