ImperiumWatch: A “Fukushima Lesson Unlearned”

The NRC rejects its own staff’s recommendation to put filters on Mark I nuclear plants.

Comments (3)
Tuesday, April 02, 2013


Fukushima: the worst nuclear disaster since Chernobyl. A meltdown that made a part of the Japanese coast uninhabitable, leaving tens of thousands in shelters with no prospect of returning to their homes.

After the nuclear catastrophe in Japan, the U.S.’s Nuclear Regulatory Commission established a Japan Lessons-Learned task force to make recommendations about how to correct conditions that might lead to a similar disaster here.

The Fukushima reactors, like the reactors at 23 plants in the U.S.—including the Vermont Yankee plant near Brattleboro and the Pilgrim plant at Plymouth—were built to a design called Mark I. The Lessons-Learned task force recommended that operators of American Mark I plants install vents capable of withstanding high heat and steam pressure, fires, and minor explosions, and a year ago in March the NRC ordered them to do that.

But now the NRC is balking at another improvement recommended by its own professional staff: equipping the so-called “hardened” vents with high-capacity radiation filters.

Without the filters, the gases released through the vents to reduce pressure in a heating reactor would be highly radioactive; reactor managers would be faced with a grim choice between letting pressure build toward an explosion and “fire-hosing downwind communities with massive amounts of radiation,” in the words of Paul Gunter, director of the watchdog group Beyond Nuclear’s Reactor Oversight Project. The nuclear industry doesn’t want to pay to install the filters, which cost about $16 million each.

In January, Massachusetts state rep Tom Calter wrote the NRC on behalf of his constituents living in Plymouth, near the Pilgrim plant, to ask them to require Mark I plant operators to install the filters. On March 19 the five NRC commissioners voted on whether to implement the staff’s recommendation that the Mark I reactors be required to have the filters by December, 2017, a year after they are required to have the vents.

Commission chairman Allison Macfarlane voted in favor of ordering the reactor operators to install the filters, which she called “a prudent and appropriate safety enhancement.” Three commissioners, William C. Ostendorf, William D. Magwood and George Apostolakis, voted for the filters, but not by order—rather by a rulemaking process of the sort that would delay their installation for years. The other commissioner, Kristine Svinicki, voted against the filters.

The logic behind the votes, as laid out in the record of the commissioners’ comments, was sometimes surprising. Magwood, for example, conceded that reactor operators need “an array of tools and options” to use in dealing with “extreme events,” but added if that if they did not “take appropriate action in the event of a severe accident,” a loss of containment integrity would occur even if there were filters. In other words, they need an array of tools—but if they don’t use the tools properly, there will still be a catastrophe. The latter point is so obvious it hardly needs to be made, but why filters shouldn’t be added to that “array of tools” was not explained.

In any case, the vote has gone down, and the Mark I reactors won’t be getting filters—at least not soon. Said Gunter, “This is fundamentally a Fukushima lesson unlearned.”•


Comments (3)
Post a Comment

They know that 75% of the plants leak tritium and regularly vent noxious substances into our air, water and soil.

They also downplay the continuing (and unstoppable) effects from Fukushima to further the nuclear agenda.

As the infamous TEPCO admitted recently a lack of "transparency" (that is, not telling the truth) was a major cause of this man-made disaster, the biggest ongoing industrial disaster in the history of mankind. The other cause was the earthquake (NOT the tsunami) but you won't hear that advertised - they continue to claim the 3 meltdowns were caused by the tsunami.

Building nuclear power plants on top of earthquake faults is not intelligent.

Organizations that practice proper Issues Management need never get to the Crisis Management stage. The Crisis Management stage is usually heralded by the (fake) apology - to mitigate the effects of bad publicity and effect reputation-control - not to fix the actual problem, which is worldwide and ongoing.

Not installing vents will simply add to the current global cancer epidemic, a situation that is "controllable" from their viewpoint because they are skilled at outright denial of peer-reviewed studies and statistics, and make up their own, as TEPCO and others well know.

Posted by Bruce on 4.2.13 at 14:10

Entergy Vermont Yankee had that blowout panel blow out with radionuclides just a few weeks ago.There are no filters coming off the secondary containment. The NRC prides themselves on defense-in depth. How the heck did Entergy turn on fans into the secondary containment, yet the louvres didn't open and the exhaust fans did not work. So an un monitored release occurred. Please do remember that when there is a radioactive release in the secondary containment it stays there until for example a panel blows out... and the wind into the containment blows it to the atmosphere. I did not give this industry permission to poison our air or water to make electricity. The Nuclear industry has no business venting radioisotopes to the New England environment. We deserve better. Please speak up and speak out to get this mess of a reactor closed.

Posted by Gary Sachs on 4.2.13 at 14:48

This is the Windscale lesson unleaned.

It was a known issue decades before Fukushima.

The filters at Windscale were known as Cockroft's folly until they saved the whole area from radiation spread when the core caught on fire.

So many lessons unlearnt over and over again.

Posted by richardw on 4.2.13 at 22:23



New User/Guest?

Find it Here:
search type:
search in:

« Previous   |   Next »
Print Email RSS feed

In Satoshi We Trust?
Outside the Cage
How solid is the case for organic and cage-free egg production?
Between the Lines: Practically Organic
Does the organic farming movement make perfect the enemy of good?
Scene Here: The Kitchen Garden Farm
From Our Readers
Profiles in Survival
Young business owners in retail-rich Northampton get along by getting along.
The Burning Question
Neighbors of a proposed wood-burning plant in Springfield cry foul air