News

Between the Lines: Chicken Scratch

Urban agricultural initiative or fowl tax?

Comments (2)
Tuesday, July 02, 2013

While working in the garden the other night, listening to my chickens going through the vocal routines they perform every evening as they go off to bed, I felt blessed that I live in rural Franklin County, in a town where neither neighbors nor town politicos have felt the need to regulate and tax my modest backyard operation.

A few days earlier, I’d met a young man who lives in Dedham, a once-rural suburb about 20 minutes from Boston. Now in his early 20s, he’d grown up as many people do these days: knowing next to nothing about where his food comes from. To fill in the gaps in his education, he decided to plant some crops and raise some chickens. So he bought a home in Dedham, fenced in his yard, dug himself a big vegetable garden and bought a small chicken coop and run. Then he went looking for chickens.

He wanted more, but he settled for six hens, conforming to rules imposed by Dedham’s Board of Health. “Even if they let me have more, I couldn’t afford it,” he told me. “For six chickens in Dedham, you need a $50 annual permit. Depending on the size and location of your property, you can have more, but then it’s $100 a year.” Given the expense of housing and feeding chickens, even the $50 fee made him question whether it’s worth it.

Dedham, of course, isn’t the only municipality in the state with such rules on the books. In fact, last month Somerville became the first city in the Commonwealth to adopt a comprehensive policy to address the rising interest in backyard food production, including regulations on gardening, raising chickens, keeping bees and other agricultural endeavors. Communities like Cambridge and Boston are right on Somerville’s heels. And while proponents of these so-called “Urban Agricultural Initiatives” insist that the policies are designed to promote public involvement in small-scale, sustainable food production, the steep annual fees on raising chickens or ducks or bees will, in the long run, deter residents from trying to raise some of their own food.

Locally, a number of communities have chicken ordinances on the books. The issue has come up in some contentious ways in Holyoke and Northampton, among other places, but so far, the region’s tax-happiest communities have managed to steer clear of imposing fees on backyard chicken growers. Sadly, the political winds that blow from Cambridge and Boston often carry bad ideas to the Pioneer Valley.

Small-space food production should be truly encouraged by local government, not tightly regulated and taxed. Politicians and consituents who view raising backyard chickens as atavistic and a nuisance should pay more attention to where their own food comes from.•

Comments (2)
Post a Comment

Small-space food needs just as much regulation as their larger cousins. Regardless of the environment in which they live, living things have specific requirements and needs to not just exist, but prosper. Raising a farm animal is nothing like raising a plant or a pet, and those folks who decide to do so, must be properly educated in order to do so. With agriculture rapidly receding from the public consciousness, we need regulation, enforcement, and education to ensure a proper food supply, not just some random hipster who might think it's cool and then later abandon the project when they realize the effort required.

I can easily see this getting out of and and people who have the best of intentions fail to understand the responsibility they take on when they raise poultry. In fact, your article completely fails to mention the growing practice of abandoning poultry at shelters when the owners can no longer meet their needs.

http://www.nbcnews.com/health/backyard-chickens-dumped-shelters-when-hipsters-cant-cope-critics-say-6C10533508

Posted by tiedyeguy on 7.9.13 at 9:22

Completely agree with tiedyguy - reasonable regulations like a $50.00-$100.00 license to raise chickens in your backyard help ensure that only people who actually have the means and the wherewithal to make the long-term committment to the animals' well-being end up going through with it.

If a $50.00 licensing fee was too much of an economic hardship for your friend from Dedham, he probably wasn't willing or able to devote the resources necessary to responsibly raise these animals in the first place.

Posted by C. E. Dunne on 7.15.13 at 6:57
Comment:

Name:

Password:

New User/Guest?

Find it Here:
keyword:
search type:
search in:

« Previous   |   Next »
Print Email RSS feed

Guest Column: Good News for Vermont
The “Dangerous” Democrat
Can gubernatorial hopeful Don Berwick win with the hot-button issues of single-payer healthcare and casinos?
News Briefs
Sky Buzz; Break That Lock, Save That Dog; UMass Wants to Test Your Tick; North Hadley: An Ecological Gem Whose Time Has Come?
Bay State Money for Bay State Races
Statehouse candidates consider pledges to ban or limit out-of-state donations.
In Good Conscience
AG candidate Maura Healey thinks Massachusetts should ditch its casino law.
Between the Lines: Familiarity Breeds Contempt
One candidate’s change of heart
From Our Readers
Gannon’s House of Cards; Corrections
Guest Column: Don’t Dictate Language