News

Guest Column: Time to Act on Climate Change

Comments (1)
Tuesday, July 02, 2013

Unless we take bold action to reverse climate change, our children, grandchildren and great-grandchildren are going to look back on this period in history and ask a very simple question: Where were they? Why didn’t the United States of America, the most powerful nation on earth, lead the international community in cutting greenhouse gas emissions and preventing the devastating damage the scientific community said would surely come?

Global warming is the most serious environmental crisis facing the world today. It demands bold action to preserve our planet for our children and grandchildren.

I have introduced legislation that would reverse greenhouse gas emissions in a significant way. It also would help create millions of jobs as we transform our energy system away from fossil fuel and into energy efficiency and such sustainable energies as wind, solar, geothermal and biomass. A major focus of this legislation is a price on carbon and methane emissions. This fee on the largest fossil-fuel polluters affects fewer than 3,000 entities nationwide but covers 85 percent of the greenhouse gas emissions in the U.S., according to the Congressional Research Service. To help consumers, 60 percent of the carbon fee revenue will be rebated to every U.S. resident.

Let me be clear: the issue that we are dealing with is not political. It has nothing to do with the squabbling we see in Washington every day. It has everything to do with physics. The leading scientists in the world who study climate change now tell us that their earlier projections were wrong. The crisis facing our planet is much worse than they had thought only a few years ago.

I applaud President Barack Obama for saying this week that he will take steps to limit heat-trapping pollution from coal-fired power plants and boost renewable energy production. These steps will help not only the environment but the economy, too, by creating many, many jobs. But let’s be clear: much more must be done.

The president must support a tax on carbon and methane emissions to show the world that the United States is prepared to transform our energy system and be an international leader on climate change. The president must demand that Congress work with him to dramatically improve energy efficiency and to greatly increase our utilization of solar, wind, geothermal and other renewable sources of energy. And the president must not give speeches about the dangers of global warming and then turn around and allow construction of the Keystone pipeline from Canada’s tar sands oil fields, which would result in a huge increase in carbon emissions.

We will never fully deal with this crisis until Congress passes strong legislation. I will continue to fight as hard as I can to do that, and I will work to rally support from American families all across this country that care deeply about their children’s and grandchildren’s future, and want to protect them from this planetary crisis.•

Comments (1)
Post a Comment

Ok, we all know global warming isn't a real thing - as if we needed further evidence after it was coined "climate change" when the warming stopped. You have no answer for the medeival warming period and little ice age, nor can you answer why the climate shouldn't "change" - ie continue the warming and cooling cycles that have taken place since the beginning of time. We know all of this. In the 70s scienties and Time magazine were warning of a coming ice age. You have the East Anglia email scandal where scientist colluded to hide data that contradicted their ongoing position on global warming.

But the "millions of jobs" issue. Green energy will create millions of jobs by shifting away from fossil fuel? Cool. What about the millions of jobs lost in the fossil fuel industry? At best, the lion's share of those jobs would simply transfer to alternative energies - 0 net jobs gained (probably a small loss). At worst and most likely, the majority of those jobs are just lost and new people take the alternative energy jobs. In either case, the idea that there will be millions of "new" jobs created is dishonest.

Posted by k on 7.4.13 at 8:00
Comment:

Name:

Password:

New User/Guest?

Find it Here:
keyword:
search type:
search in:

« Previous   |   Next »
Print Email RSS feed

From Our Readers
Baker: More of the Same; Props to Rohmann; Props to Rohmann
Between the Lines: A Gun Owner’s Resentment
Why make it expensive and difficult for law-abiding residents to possess firearms?
Sorry, Nixon
If the impeachment of our 37th president showed that the system works, what does Obama’s continued political survival say about it?
The Zipcar Is Here
Car sharing takes hold in the Valley.
Under the Microscope
Did ex-WSU president Evan Dobelle use university resources to support an identity as well as a lifestyle?
From Our Readers
Casino Opposition “Selfish”; Cut Foreign Aid, Not Our Military
Between the Lines: Deval’s Capital Management
He can rehab his office, but what about his legacy?
From Snowden to the Pentagon Papers
Can student interest in civics be rekindled?