From Our Readers

Comments (5)
Tuesday, March 04, 2014

Of Reagan and Seeger

Amherst resident Simon Lesser (“Hail, Seeger!”, Letters, February 20, 2014) must either be very young or very stupid. Maybe both.

He rants about President Reagan, a great American who kept this country safe by stopping the Cold War, and praises Pete Seeger.

Seeger was nothing more than a good songwriter/singer. Politically, he was an ardent Stalinist. From 1939 through 1941, the early years of World War II, he pleaded for peace, but when Hitler invaded Russia he changed his tune (no pun intended) and was all-out for war. He admired Stalin, a brutal dictator who starved millions of his own people.

Lesser should read something about how horrible starving to death is and rethink his thoughts about Seeger.

Obamacare Is Not a Failure

The Republicans always seem to be against the middle class and on the wrong side of history. It is true that with the Affordable Care Act, some people who have stayed in jobs just for the health insurance will no longer have that problem. People who always wanted to start a business of their own will be able to give it a go because health insurance will continue if they leave that job.

Republicans are painting that as jobs lost. It is not. It is jobs now available for the unemployed. Considering that there are three applicants for every open position, these newly available jobs are a good thing. It’s a very favorable side effect of Obamacare and a boost to the economy. It is not a failure of the ACA.

It’s time for Republicans to stop putting a negative spin on a good thing just so they can say that Obamacare is a failure. Obamacare is not ideal, but it is better than what we had. A public option that eliminates insurance company profits would be better, but the ACA is all we got, and it is a step in the right direction.


Presidents’ Abuse of Power

Presidents have abused their powers by circumventing Congress with executive orders, which could be unconstitutional in many cases. Presidential executive orders proliferated with Eisenhower starting in 1953, and have become commonplace instruments of presidents. Over the previous 60 years, approximately 3,200 executive orders have been enacted, 1830 by Republicans and 1370 by Democrats.

President Obama is currently using executive orders to circumvent the Republican-controlled House of Representatives. He recently proclaimed, “When I can act on my own without Congress, I’m going to do so.” He ordered an increase in the minimum wage for federal contractors and extended the deadline for the implementation of elements of Obamacare for one year. He lifted a ban that automatically prohibited people who provided “limited material support” to terrorists from entering the U.S.

The Supreme Court plans to review the Constitutional limits of executive power, including the unprecedented number of Obama appointments made when Congress was in recess. Although all presidents starting with Herbert Hoover have used executive orders, Obama is the first president to publicly declare this maneuver an official part of administration policy. The Supreme Court might have to take action to halt our slide on the slippery slope to dictatorship.

Comments (5)
Post a Comment

Seek help, Malita Brown. You're not in your right mind.

Posted by Mental Floss on 3.5.14 at 10:15

Malita, you aren't making the compelling story you think you are making.

Posted by Cry Me a River on 3.6.14 at 14:53

Obamacare Is Not a Failure

Republicans are anti-middle class and anti-worker, the two classes that have made the United States a good country. Most of the things that are wrong about ACA are things that the Republicans insisted on adding to it, such as inclusion of their buddies in the insurance industry. Of course Democrat double crossers had to help them do it. Big business is reponsible for the unemployment through outsourcing in an effort to get as close to slave labor wages as they can get.

Posted by Robert Underwood on 3.7.14 at 8:06

Robert Underwood, you're another one. Once again you just regurgitate the most brain-addled, conspiratorial nonsense this side of the Rockies. Your recent article in the Advocate was a masterpiece of rambling and bloviated rhetoric searching for a theme - all shadow and no substance.

We get it, dude: the political parties, business, and the Illuminati are all out to get us.

Posted by John Galt on 3.7.14 at 10:14

Notice how the trolls John and Mental fail to refute any single point of the article? Typical sham move on the part of republicans and conservatives who puppet what their corporate overlords tell them to say.

When you know what you are saying and writing are lies and disprovable, you learn to just hate and try and incite others to hate as well.

Notice how they are very upset that several readers posted their own opinions and analysis of the situation? Typical for a group who doesn't want an honest dicussion based on facts.

Posted by tiedyeguy on 3.11.14 at 8:26



New User/Guest?

Find it Here:
search type:
search in:

« Previous   |   Next »
Print Email RSS feed

From Our Readers
Baker: More of the Same; Props to Rohmann; Props to Rohmann
Between the Lines: A Gun Owner’s Resentment
Why make it expensive and difficult for law-abiding residents to possess firearms?
Sorry, Nixon
If the impeachment of our 37th president showed that the system works, what does Obama’s continued political survival say about it?
The Zipcar Is Here
Car sharing takes hold in the Valley.
Under the Microscope
Did ex-WSU president Evan Dobelle use university resources to support an identity as well as a lifestyle?
From Our Readers
Casino Opposition “Selfish”; Cut Foreign Aid, Not Our Military
Between the Lines: Deval’s Capital Management
He can rehab his office, but what about his legacy?
From Snowden to the Pentagon Papers
Can student interest in civics be rekindled?