News

From Our Readers

Conspiracies and Actual Conspiracies; Feeding Friends, Saving Neighbors; Vegetarians Vs. Meateaters

Comments (4)
Wednesday, March 12, 2014

Conspiracies and Actual Conspiracies

In Charlotte Burns’ letter “Skeptical of Case Against Tsarnaev” [February 27, 2014] she writes, “Having lived through the Kennedy assassination, the Vietnam War and 9/11, I am totally cynical… of our government and media,” and she goes on to ask dark questions dripping with origami-like conspiracies about the Boston Marathon bombing and its aftermath.

But it is less cynicism her letter conveys than delusion. For decades now the actual conspiracies of government—the Gulf of Tonkin, Cointelpro, CIA assassinations, Watergate burglaries, Iran/Contra, phony intel on Iraq, renditions, black sites, and the NSA’s eavesdropping gluttony—have all been revealed, often by regular Joes and Janes in the media or relatively low-level whistleblowers like Edward Snowden.

So the notion that there are even more conspiracies, deeply hidden, which cannot be revealed does border, if not on psychological delusion, then at least on an intellectual weariness ever more contagious in this age of “Internet truthiness.”

Good citizenship today relies on relentless critical thinking, not conspiracy theories.

 

Feeding Friends, Saving Neighbors

J. is one of my favorite patrons at Lorraine’s Soup Kitchen and Pantry in Chicopee. As a full-time mother of two, it pained her to see her husband’s work hours get cut to part-time. Even after picking up an additional part-time job, they still found themselves forced to choose between paying bills and buying food. Fortunately for J., she was able to find us and get the food she needed from our pantry.

 A reduction in Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits has sent a tremendous number of families like J.’s to Lorraine’s. With recent budget cuts and a diminished USDA surplus, we have a great need to provide for the countless families that depend on us. Because of our supporters, we have been able to ensure that J. and the rest of our patrons will never have to explain to their children why there is no food on the table.

Last year, Lorraine’s saw almost 9,000 Chicopee families and distributed more than 404,000 pounds of food. Those numbers are only going to increase. Families are losing up to $40 a month in assistance, and this is placing a tremendous strain on our services. We need monetary donations now more than ever.

People often ask me why only donating food isn’t enough. At Lorraine’s, I am able to leverage dollars to purchase food from the Food Bank of Western Massachusetts. So when you donate money, your dollars go that much further than a can of food because we can buy food to distribute at $.19 a pound, which beats any grocery.

So far, we have been able to raise $26,590. In fact, we only need $8,410 to reach our goal. That’s just 43 $200 donations.

I want to extend my sincerest appreciation to everyone who has made a gift to Lorraine’s. Your support goes a long way toward helping Chicopee friends and neighbors. If you would like to get involved, I urge you to visit our website, www.LorrainesSoupKitchen.com, to make a secure online donation to help us reach our goal, apply to be a volunteer, or read up on news and events that impact the Chicopee community.

 

Vegetarians Vs. Meateaters

Here’s another reason to eat veggie burgers rather than hamburgers. A recent meta-analysis published in the Journal of the American Medical Association: Internal Medicine confirms that vegetarians have significantly lower blood pressure than their meat-eating counterparts. This means that vegetarians are also less likely to suffer from heart disease, strokes, kidney failure, dementia and other serious health problems.

Comments (4)
Post a Comment

Joe Gannon, if you're going to toss around the word delusional to attack someone someone expressing an opinion, however ill-informed, I think you'd better look in the mirror.

She may be off the mark with her ideas on this particular case, but if you’re going to pit delusion against relentless critical thinking, then think about this:

You clearly accept and believe that there have been actual conspiracies of government.

One of the major goals of a government conspiracy, aside from it having its intended effect, is to keep it a secret. And they usually do a good job of it. You know, Top Secret, Classified, Interests of National Security, that sort of stuff.

What kind of logic or critical thinking allows you to believe that all government conspiracies have now been revealed? This makes no sense at all. You would have made the exact same argument before the most recent one was revealed, and of course, you would have been wrong.
You would have made the same argument before others were revealed, too.
After the next one is revealed, what are you going to say? “Well now they really have all been revealed?”

Neither you nor anyone else outside of these agencies has any idea whether what has been discovered or leaked, or revealed by a dumb mistake, like the Watergate burglary, is the tip of the iceberg, or any other fraction of what remains unrevealed.

But there’s no bloody way it’s all.

Posted by Phil Cigagna on 3.12.14 at 21:02

A delusion is a belief held with strong conviction despite superior evidence to the contrary.

Charlotte Burns conduct would clearly lead an indpendent bystander to draw the conclusion that delusional would be an apt description of her behaviour.

In fact, Phil's rant above would likely qualify him for the label using the textbook definitions.

Posted by tiedyeguy on 3.13.14 at 12:29

tiedyeguy, are you saying you have evidence that all government conspiracies that have ever been carried out or attempted have been revealed to the public? And that therefore, even more conspiracies, deeply hidden won't at some point be revealed? What is this superior eveidence you speak of?

Are you saying Mr Gannon only came to his conclusion after the Snowden affair, that somehow this signifies that there are no more secrets? And that before the Snowden affair he surely believed there were more to come?

Please explain, which part of my "rant" do you find unreasonable?

Posted by Phil Cigagna on 3.13.14 at 19:08

Rats, spellcheck does not seem to work here, sorry.

Posted by Phil Cigagna on 3.13.14 at 19:10
Comment:

Name:

Password:

New User/Guest?

Find it Here:
keyword:
search type:
search in:

« Previous   |   Next »
Print Email RSS feed


In Satoshi We Trust?
Outside the Cage
How solid is the case for organic and cage-free egg production?
Between the Lines: Practically Organic
Does the organic farming movement make perfect the enemy of good?
Scene Here: The Kitchen Garden Farm
From Our Readers
Profiles in Survival
Young business owners in retail-rich Northampton get along by getting along.
The Burning Question
Neighbors of a proposed wood-burning plant in Springfield cry foul air