Many issues were raised but only a few were addressed due to time constraints. The hearing began at about 10:15 and ran until 12:45 AM Friday morning. Among the points of concern mentioned by the 19 public speakers or the board members:

  1. snow removal
  2. bike path and its proximity to the garage
  3. the massing and setbacks of the buildings
  4. room reduction
  5. new parking adjacent to Round House office building
  6. playground structure
  7. control of Pulaski Park
  8. environmental efficiency of buildings
  9. green aspects of buildings
  10. traffic noise/echo effect in garage
  11. openings on west side of garage
  12. vegetation screens and buffers
  13. scale of building against park
  14. proximity of dumpster to apartment house
  15. smell and noise of compacting dumpster; recyclables
  16. elevator in garage
  17. employee parking
  18. front patio access for public
  19. Pulaski Park handicap access
  20. bromine venting from swimming pool
  21. location of air conditioners
  22. tree removal at rear of park and heat island effect; replace like for like
  23. access for handicapped persons around site
  24. public access through hotel, similar to Thornes and public garage
  25. location of loading dock
  26. height related to Round House office building
  27. impacts on natural lighting
  28. tunnel effect of newly created alley ways
  29. thorough landscaping analysis
  30. darkness of ground floor porches-only windows in units
  31. emergency access
  32. distance between buildings
  33. presence of children and handicapped on rear porches
  34. carbon footprint of building
  35. natural light impacts on park
  36. loss of mountain views
  37. exterior materials to be used
  38. alteration of historic area
  39. air and noise pollution from garage
  40. ventilation
  41. tenants in apartments quality of life
  42. marketability of apartments/ need 100% occupancy to work
  43. public interaction with hotel/garage
  44. storm water concerns (DPW)
  45. corporate influence in the city
  46. best use of land
  47. air quality meters and testing
  48. bicycle racks
  49. developer constructing portion of bicycle trail
  50. market study
  51. relocating utilities
  52. parking, providing 14 more spaces than required
  53. blocking of potential roadway-Route 66 connector
  54. lighting on/in garage
  55. environmental cleanup/brownfield
  56. intersection fail rates unchanged
  57. park extension
  58. retaining wall near apartments
  59. grants and funding for cleanup feasibility
  60. role of Dept. of Environmental Protection and Bay State Gas

93 year old Phyllis Rodin prepares to state her case for Pulaski Park closure due to the presence of toxins

Valley Advocate journalist Kendra Thurlow zooms in on a schematic.

Mark Darnold of Berkshire Design Group addresses planning board

Darnold and planning boards members Steve Gilson and George Russell

a determined Rodin speeds off to fight another day

Joanne Campbell, Exec. Director Valley Community Development Corp.

Michael DePasquale, Kensington Avenue

Bill Pastore, New South Street apartments

architect Peter Frothingham

Mary Kasper, former arts council director

Michael Kusek, Crescent Street

planning board members-listening?

officials-listening?

Damia Stewart reads letter from Jordi Herold

Mike Kirby, "Only way to let project move forward is to be indifferent."

Mary Chapin, distances don’t seem right

architect Tris Metcalfe